EasyEmailAPI vs Kickbox
EasyEmailAPI and Kickbox both provide email verification services, but they differ in pricing, API focus, and product philosophy.
Quick comparison
| Feature | EasyEmailAPI | Kickbox |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | API-first email validation | UI + API |
| Real-time email validation | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk email verification | Yes | Yes |
| Catch-all detection | Yes | Yes |
| Disposable email detection | Yes | Yes |
| Role-based email detection | Yes | Yes |
| Syntax & MX checks | Yes | Yes |
| GDPR compliant | Yes (EU-friendly) | Yes |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Credit-based |
| Free tier | Yes | Trial only |
Pricing comparison
EasyEmailAPI offers straightforward pricing with no subscriptions.
Kickbox uses a credit-based model that can scale up in cost with volume.
Summary
- EasyEmailAPI is easier to budget.
- Kickbox is suitable for occasional bulk checks.
API and developer experience
EasyEmailAPI is optimized for backend and SaaS usage:
- Simple REST API
- Fast responses
- No UI dependency
Kickbox provides an API but emphasizes UI-based list uploads.
Accuracy and validation approach
Both services handle:
- Syntax and domain checks
- SMTP verification
- Disposable and role-based detection
EasyEmailAPI prioritizes real-time validation accuracy.
GDPR and data handling
EasyEmailAPI is designed for GDPR-sensitive environments and EU users.
Kickbox is GDPR compliant, but processing details depend on usage patterns.
When Kickbox is a good fit
- You validate lists occasionally.
- You prefer UI-based workflows.
- You do not need continuous API usage.
When EasyEmailAPI is the better choice
- You need ongoing API validation.
- You want simple pricing.
- You are building a product, not campaigns.
Final verdict
Kickbox is campaign-oriented and UI-focused. EasyEmailAPI is lightweight, fast, and developer-first.
For API-driven validation, EasyEmailAPI is the better option.
Get started
Start validating emails with EasyEmailAPI
Free tier available, no credit card required, and fast setup.